-
Aland,
Kurt. “Bemerkungen zum Schluss des Markusevangliums.”
Pages 157–180 in
Neotestamentica et Semitica: Studies in Honour of Matthew Black.
Edited by E. Earle Ellis and Max Wilcox. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1969.
-
__________. “Der wiedergefundene Markusschluss?” Zeitschrift für
Theologie und Kirche 67, no. 1 (1970): 3–13.
-
__________, and
Barbara Aland, eds. Die synoptischen Evangelien. Vol. 4:1 of
Text und Textwert der griechischen Handschriften des Neuen
Testaments. Berlin; New York: de Gruyter, 1987.
(pp.
406–417).
-
Anderson, Hugh.
The Gospel of Mark. NCB. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1996 (pp.
351–362).
-
Anderson, Janice
Capel and Stephen D. Moore, eds. Mark and Method: New Approaches
in Biblical Studies. 2nd edition. Minneapolis:
Fortress, 2008.
-
Baarda, Tjitze.
“An Unexpected Reading in the West-Saxon Gospel Text of Mark 16.11.”
New Testament Studies 41, no 3 (July 1995): 458–465.
-
Bailey, James L.
“Perspectives on the Gospel of Mark.” Currents in Theology and
Mission 12, no 1 (February 1985): 15–25.
-
Ballantine,
Elodie. A Preliminary Study of the Ending of Mark’s Gospel.
Thesis (M.A.), Denver Conservative Baptist Seminary, 1984.
-
Bartsch, H.-W.
“Der Schluss des Markus-Evangeliums:
Ein
überlieferungsgeschichtliches
Problem.” ThZ 27 (1971): 241-254.
-
Beavis, Mary Ann.
Mark. Paideia. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2011 (pp.
244–250).
-
Black, David
Alan, editor. Perspectives on the Ending of Mark. Nashville:
Broadman & Holman, 2008.
-
Bode, Edward
Lynn. The First Easter Morning: The Gospel Accounts of the
Women's Visit to the Tomb of Jesus. Rome: Biblical Institute
Press, 1970 (pp. 44–48).
-
Boomershine,
Thomas E. “Mark 16:8 and the Apostolic Commission.” Journal of
Biblical Literature 100, no. 2 (June 1981): 225-239.
-
____________. and
Gilbert L. Bartholomew. “The Narrative Technique of Mark 16:8.”
JBL 100 (1981): 213–242.
-
Boring, M. Eugene
and Fred B. Craddock. The People’s New Testament Commentary.
Louisville, KY: John Knox Press, 2009 (pp. 171–173).
-
Bridges, Carl B.
“The Canonical Status of the Longer Ending of Mark.”
Stone-Campbell Journal 9 (2006): 231–242.
-
Broadus, John A.
“Exegetical Studies: Style of Mark xvi 9–20, as Bearing on the
Question of Genuineness.” Baptist Quarterly 3 (1869):
355–362.
-
Broer, I. “Zur
heutigen Diskussion der Grabesgeschichte (Mk 16, 1–8).” BibLeb
10 (1969): 40–52.
-
Brooks, James A.
Mark. NAC. Nashville: Broadman Press, 1991 (pp. 271-276).
-
Brown, Scott G.
“The Longer Gospel of Mark and the Synoptic Problem.” New Studies
in the Synoptic Problem (April 2008): 753–781.
-
Bruce, A.B. “The
Synoptic Gospels.” Pages 3–651 of Expositor’s Greek Testament,
Vol. 1. Edited by W. Robertson Nicholl. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson,
2002 (pp. 453–457).
-
Bruce, F.F. “The
End of the Second Gospel.” EvQ 17 (1945): 169–181.
-
________. The
New Testament Documents: Are They Reliable? Grand Rapids, MI:
Eerdmans, 1960.
-
Burgon, E.S.
The Last Twelve Verses of the Gospel of St. Mark Vindicated against
Recent Critical Objectors and Established. London: James Parker,
1871.
-
Bush, R.A.
“Mark’s Call to Action: A Rhetorical Analysis of Mark 16:8.” In
Church Divinity. Ed. J. Morgan. Bristol: Wyndham Hall, 1986 (pp.
22–30).
-
Cadbury, H.J.
“Mark 16:8.” JBL 46 (1927): 344–350.
-
Cadwallader, Alan
H. “The Hermeneutical Potential of the Multiple Endings of Mark’s
Gospel.” Colloquium 43, no 2 (November 2011): 129–146.
-
Camery–Hoggatt,
Jerry. Irony in Mark’s Gospel: Text and Subtext. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, 2005.
-
Carlson, Niel L.
“The Long Ending of Mark: Debating the Origin of the Last Twelve
Verses.” Logia 22, no 4 (2013): 39–41.
-
Clark, Kenneth W.
“The Theological Relevance of Textual Variation in Current Criticism
of the Greek New Testament.” JBL 85 (1966): 1–16.
-
Cole, R. Alan.
The Gospel according to Mark: An Introduction and Commentary.
Revised ed. TNTC. Leicester, UK: InterVarsity, 1989 (pp. 329–340).
-
Collins, Adela
Yarbro. Mark: A Commentary. Herm. Minneapolis: Fortress, 2007
(pp. 779–782, 797–801; “Additional Endings of Mark,” pp. 802–818).
-
Colwell, E.C.
“Mark 16.9–20 in the Armenian Version.” JBL 55 (1937):
369–386.
-
Comfort, Philip
Wesley. New Testament Text and Translation Commentary: Commentary
on the Variant Readings of the Ancient New Testament Manuscripts and
How They Relate to the Major English Translations. Carol Stream,
IL: Tyndale House Publishers, Inc., 2008 (pp. 157–163).
-
Conybeare, F.C.
“Ariston, the Author of the Last Twelve Verses of Mark.”
Expositor 4.8 (1893): 241–254.
-
________. “On the
Last Twelve Verses of Mark’s Gospel.” The Expositor 5.2
(1895): 401–421.
-
Cox, Steven L.
A History and Critique of Scholarship concerning the Markan Endings.
Lampeter, UK: Edwin Mellen, 1993.
-
Cranfield, C. E.
B. “St. Mark 16.1–8.” SJT 5 (1952): 282–298, 398–414.
-
_________. The
Gospel According to St. Mark. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press, 1959 (pp. 469–476).
-
Creed, J. M. “The
Conclusion of the Gospel according to Saint Mark.” JTS o.s.
31 (1930): 175–180.
-
Croy, N. Clayton.
The Mutilation of Mark’s Gospel. Nashville: Abington, 2003.
-
Culpepper, R.
Alan. Mark. Smyth & Helwys Bible Commentary. Macon, GA: Smyth
& Helwys, 2007 (“The Later Endings of Mark,” pp. 590–593).
-
Daniel, Lillian.
“The Weirdly Real Ending of Mark.” Journal for Preachers 36,
no 3 (2013): 24–27.
-
Danove, Paul L.
The End of Mark’s Story: A Methodological Study. Leiden:
Brill, 1993.
-
Dart, John.
“Unfinished Gospel?: Mark’s Enigmatic Ending.” The Christian
Century 123, no 8 (April 2006): 28–32.
-
Decker, Rodney J.
Mark 9–16: A Handbook on the Greek Text. Waco: Baylor
University Press, 2014 (pp. 277–280; “Appendix: Ancient Christian
Writings Related to the Ending of the Gospel of Mark,” pp. 281–291).
-
Decker, Rodney J.
"Mark and Miracle (Mark 16:17-18)." http://ntresources.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/Decker_MarkAndMiracle_Mk16_short1.pdf.
-
Dhanis, E.
“L’ensevelissement de Jésus et la visite au tombeau dans l’évangile
de saint Marc (xv, 40–xvi, 8).” Greg 39 (1958): 367–410.
-
Dietzfelbinger,
D. “Markus 16,1–8.” Pages 9–22 in Kranzbacher Gespräch der
Lutherischen Bischofskonferenz zur Auseinandersetzung um die Bibel.
Ed. H. Schnell. Berlin; Hamburg: Lutherisches Verlaghaus, 1967.
-
Donahue, John R.,
and Daniel J. Harrington. The Gospel of Mark. SP.
Collegeville, MN: Liturgical, 2002 (“Later Endings,” pp. 462–464).
-
Doudna, John
Charles. The Greek of the Gospel of Mark. Philadelphia: SBL,
1961.
-
Dowd, Sharyn E.
Reading Mark: A Literary and Theological Commentary on the Second
Gospel. Macon, GA: Smith and Helwys, 2000.
-
Edmunds, Albert
J. The End of the Gospel According to Mark: In the Oldest
Manuscripts and Versions. Philadelphia: Innes & Sons, 1916.
-
Edwards, James R.
The Gospel according to Mark. PNTC. Grand Rapids, MI:
Eerdmans, 2001 (pp. 495–508).
-
________. “Markan
Sandwiches: The Significance of Interpolations in Markan
Narratives.” Pages 192–215 in The Composition of Mark’s Gospel:
Selected Studies from Novum Testamentum. Edited by David E.
Orton. Leiden: Brill, 2009.
-
Ehrman, Bart D.
“The Text of Mark in the Hands of the Orthodox.” Lutheran
Quarterly 5, no 2 (1991): 143–156.
-
Elliott, J.K.
The Language and Style of the Gospel of Mark. Leiden: Brill,
1993.
-
________. “Text
and Language of the Endings to Mark’s Gospel.” Theologische
Zeitschrift 27, no 4 (1971): 255–262.
-
________. “The
Last Twelve Verses of Mark: Original or Not?” Pages 80–102 in
Perspectives on the Ending of Mark: Four Views. Edited by
David Alan Black. Nashville: Broadman and Holman, 2008.
-
Evans, Craig A.
Mark 8:27–16:20. WBC. Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson
Publishers, 2001 (pp. 538–551).
-
Farmer, William
R. The Last Twelve Verses of Mark. SNTSMS 25. London:
Cambridge University Press, 1974.
-
Fee, Gordon D. “A
Text-Critical Look at the Synoptic Problem.” Novum Testamentum
22, no 1 (January 1980): 12–28.
-
Focant, Camille.
“La canonicité de la finale longue (Mc 16,9–20): vers la
reconnaissance d’un double texte canonique?” Biblical Canons
(2003): 587–597.
-
________. The
Gospel According to Mark: A Commentary. Translated by Leslie
Robert Keylock. Eugene, OR: Pickwick Publications, 2012 (pp.
653–676).
-
________.
“Un silence qui
fait parler (Mc 16,8).” Pages 79–96 in New Testament Textual
Criticism and Exegesis: Festschrift J. Delobel. Edited by A.
Denaux. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2002.
-
France, R.T.
The Gospel of Mark. NIGTC. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2002 (pp.
670–684; “Appended Note: The Textual Evidence for the Ending of
Mark,” pp. 685–688).
-
Frey, Johannes.
Der Schluss des Markus Evangeliums und die Erscheinungen des
Auferstandenen. Leipzig: Deichert, 1913.
-
Gage, Warren A.
“Jesus as the New Elijah and the Textual Question regarding the
Ending of the Gospel of Mark.” Unpublished paper, 2001.
-
Galbraith, Deane.
“Did Jesus Rise from the Dead? Casey on Jesus (3)–The Gospel of
Mark’s Missing Ending.” Religion Bulletin, April 19, 2011,
accessed July 25, 2015. http://www.equinoxpub.com/blog/2011/04/caseys-jesus-3-marks-ending/.
-
Garland, David E. Mark. NIVAC.
Grand Rapids:
Zondervan, 1996.
-
Gaventa, Beverly
Roberts, and Patrick D. Miller. The Ending of Mark and the Ends
of God: Essays in Memory of Donald Harrisville Juel. Louisville,
KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 2005.
-
Geddert, Timothy
J. Mark. Scottdale, Pa.: Herald Press, 2001 (pp. 398–399;
“The ending of Mark’s Gospel [and Remarks on 16:9–20],” pp. 400–403;
“Textual Criticism of Mark,” pp. 429–431).
-
Giesen, Η. “Der
Auferstandene und seine Gemeinde: Zum Inhalt und zur Funktion des
ursprünglichen Markusschlusses (16:1–8).” SNTSU 12 (1987): 99–139.
-
Gnilka, Joachim.
Das
Evangelium nach Markus.
Evangelisch–katholischer Kommentar zum Neuen Testament.
Zurich: Benziger/Neukirchener,
1979 (pp. 344–350; “Anhang: Die sekundären
Markus-Schlüsse,”
pp. 350–358).
-
Gould, Ezra P.
A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Gospel According to St.
Mark. ICC. New York: Charles Scribner, 1907 (pp. 301–309).
-
Grimme, H.
“Harmonie zwischen Anfang und Schluss des Markusevangeliums.” ΤQ
126 (1946): 276–89.
-
Gundry, Robert H.
Mark: A Commentary on His Apology for the Cross. Grand
Rapids: Eerdmans, 1993 (pp. 1009–1021).
-
Güttgemanns, Ε.
“Linguistische Analyse von Mk 16,1–8.” LB 11–12 (1972):
13–53.
-
Guthrie, Donald.
New Testament Introduction. Downers Grove, IL: Inter-Varsity
Press, 1970 (“The Ending of the Gospel,” pp. 89–93).
-
Harris, James
Rendel. “On the Alternative Ending of St. Mark’s Gospel.” Journal
of Biblical Literature 12, no 2 (1893).
-
Hartman, Lars.
“Mark 16:1–8: The Ending of a Biography–like Narrative and of a
Gospel.” Theology & Life 30 (2007): 31–47.
-
Healy, Mary and
Peter S. Williamson. The Gospel of Mark. Grand Rapids, MI:
Baker Academic, 2008 (pp. 327–335).Bottom
of Form
-
Hebert, G. “The
Resurrection-Narrative in St. Mark’s Gospel.” STJ 15 (1962):
66–73.
-
Hedrick, Charles
W. “What Is a Gospel: Geography, Time and Narrative Structure.”
Perspectives in Religious Studies 10, no. 3 (September 1983):
255–268.
-
Heil, John Paul.
The Gospel of Mark as a Model for Action: A Reader–Response
Commentary. New York/Mahwah, NJ: Paulist, 1991.
-
Helton, Stanley
N. “Churches of Christ and Mark 16:9–20.” Restoration Quarterly
36, no 1 (1994): 33–52.
-
Henaut, B. W.
“Empty Tomb or Empty Argument: A Failure of Nerve in Recent Studies
of Mark 16?” SR 15 (1986): 177–190.
-
Henderson,
Suzanne Watts. “Discipleship after the Resurrection: Scribal
Hermeneutics in the Longer Ending of Mark.” Journal of
Theological Studies 63, no 1 (April 2012): 106–124.
-
Hendriksen,
William. Exposition of the Gospel according to Mark. Grand
Rapids: Baker, 2002. (“The Problem with Respect to Mark 16:9–20,”
pages 682–693).
-
Hengel, Martin.
Studies in the Gospel of Mark. London: SCM, 1985 (pp. 71–72;
pp. 167–169, fn 47).
-
Hester, J. David.
“Dramatic Inconclusion: Irony and the Narrative Rhetoric of the
Ending of Mark.” JSNT 57 (1995): 61–85.
-
Hester, David W.
Does Mark 16:9–20 Belong in the New Testament? Eugene,
Oregon: Wipf & Stock Publishers, 2015.
-
Holding, James
Patrick. “How Did Mark’s Gospel End?” Tekton Apologetics,
accessed July 31, 2015. http://www.tektonics.org/lp/markend.php.
-
Holmes, Michael
W. “To Be Continued . . . The Many Endings of Mark.” BR 17.4
(2001): 12–23, 48–50.
-
Holmes, Mike.
“The Ending of Mark 16:8: Intentional or Accidental?” Trinity
Journal 5 (1976): 102–108.
-
Hooker, Morna D.
The Gospel According to Mark. BNTC. [Peabody, MA]:
Hendrickson, 1993 (pp. 382–394).
-
Horvath, T. “The
Early Markan Tradition on the Resurrection (Mk. 16,1–8).” RUO
43 (1973): 445–448.
-
Huffman, Norman.
“Suggestions from the Gospel of Mark for a New Textual Theory.”
Journal of Biblical Literature 56, no 4 (1937): 347–359.
-
Hug, Joseph.
La finale de l'évangile
de Marc: (Mc 16,
9-20). Paris: Gabalda, 1978.
-
Hurtado, Larry W.
“The Women, the Tomb, and the Climax of Mark.” Pages 427–450 in A
Wandering Galilean: Essays in Honour of Sean Freyne. Edited by
Zuleika Rodgers. Leiden: Brill, 2009.
-
Iverson, Kelly R.
“A Further Word of Final
Γάρ
(Mark 16:8).” Catholic Biblical Quarterly 68 (2006): 79–94.
-
Joynes, Christine
E. “The Sound of Silence: Interpreting Mark 16:1–8 through the
Centuries.” Int 65.1 (2011): 18–29.
-
Juel, Donald H.
The Gospel of Mark. Interpreting Biblical Texts. Nashville:
Abingdon, 1999.
-
_________.
Mark. Augsburg Commentary on the New Testament. Minneapolis:
Augsburg, 1990 (“Excursus: A Textual Problem [16:1-8 (20)],” pp.
229–231).
-
Kahle, Paul E.
“The End of St. Mark’s Gospel: The Witness of the Coptic Versions.”
JTS 11 (1951): 49–57.
-
Kelhoffer, James
A. “Basilides’s Gospel and Exegetica (Treatises).” VigChr
59 (2005): 115–135. Also found in pages 77–95 of Conceptions
of “Gospel” and Legitimacy in Early Christianity. By James A.
Kelhoffer. WUNT. Tübingen:
Mohr Siebeck, 2014.
-
________.
Miracle and
Mission: The Authentication of Missionaries and Their Message in the
Longer Ending of Mark.
Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2000.
-
________. “The
Disciples as Miracle Workers in the Synoptic Gospels as Compared
with Mark’s Longer Ending (Mark 16:9–20).” Proceedings 18
(1998): 65–79.
-
________. “The
Witness of Eusebius’ ad Marinum and Other Christian Writings
to Text-Critical Debates Concerning the Original Conclusion to
Mark’s Gospel.”
Zeitschrift für
die
neutestamentliche Wissenschaft und die Kunde der alteren Kirche
92, no 1–2 (2001): 78–112.
-
Kevin, Robert
Oliver. “The Lost Ending of the Gospel according to Mark: A
Criticism and a Reconstruction.” JBL 45 (1926): 81–103.
-
Knox, Wilfred
Lawrence. “The Ending of St. Mark’s Gospel.” Harvard Theological
Review 35, no 1 (January 1942): 13–23.
-
Kraeling, C.H. “A
Philological Note on Mark 16:8.” JBL 44 (1925): 357–358.
-
Kuskem, David P.
“Textual Criticism Brief: Mark 16:9–20.” Lutheran Quarterly
102, no 1 (2005): 58–59.
-
Lagrange,
Marie-Joseph. Evangile selon Saint Marc. 6th edition corr. et
augm. Paris: Gabalda, 1942 (pp. 444–468).
-
Lane, William L.
The Gospel of Mark. NICNT. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1995 (pp.
582–592; “Additional Note on the Supplementary Endings to the
Gospel,” pp. 601–605; “Additional Note on the Theology of the Freer
Logion,” pp. 606-611).
-
Lee, Sug-Ho.
Unbelief as a Theme in Mark’s Gospel. PhD diss, University of
Pretoria, 2006.
-
Lenski, R.C.H.
The Interpretation of St. Mark’s Gospel. Colombus, OH. Wartburg:
1945 (pp. 748–775).
-
Lewis, Jack. “The
Ending of Mark.” The Lifestyle of Jesus According to the Gospel
of Mark. Searcy, AR: Harding University, 1988.
-
Lightfoot, R.H.
“St. Mark’s Gospel—Complete or Incomplete?” Pages 80–97 in The
Gospel Message of St. Mark. Oxford: Clarendon, 1950.
-
Lincoln, Andrew
T. “The Promise and Failure: Mark 16:7, 8.” JBL 108 (1989):
283–300.
-
Lindemann, Andreas. “Die Osterbotschaft des Markus: Zur
theologischen Interpretation von Mark 16:1–8.” New Testament
Studies 26, no 3 (April 1980): 298–317.
-
Linnemann, Eta.
“Der
(wiedergefundene) Markusschluss.”
Zeitschrift für Theologie und Kirche
66, no 3 (1969): 255–287.
-
Longacre, Robert E. “A Top-Down, Template-Driven Narrative Analysis,
Illustrated by Application to Mark’s Gospel.” Pages 140–168 in
Discourse Analysis and the New Testament: Approaches and Results.
Edited by Stanley Porter and Jeffrey T. Reed. JSNT Supplement Series
170. Sheffield, UK: Sheffield Academic Press, 1999.
-
Lunn, Nicholas.
The Original Ending of Mark. Eugene, OR: Pickwick, 2014.
-
Luccock, Halford
E. “The Gospel according to Saint Mark: Exposition.” Pages 629–917
in The Interpreter’s Bible, Vol. 7. Edited by George Arthur
Buttrick. New York: Abington, 1951.
-
Lührmann,
Dieter. Das Markusevangelium. Handbuch zum Neuen Testament 3.
Tübingen:
Mohr, 1987 (“Das textkritische Problem des Mk-Schlusses,” pp.
268–270).
-
Lundbum, Jack R.
“Closure in Mark’s Gospel.” Seminary Ridge Review 9.1 (2006):
33–41.
-
Magness, J. Lee.
Sense and Absence: Structure and Suspension in the Ending of
Mark’s Gospel. Atlanta: Scholars, 1986.
-
Malbon, Elizabeth
Struthers. Narrative Space and Mythic Meaning in Mark. San
Francisco: Harper and Row, 1986.
-
Mann, C.S.
Mark: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary. AB 27.
New York: Doubleday, 1986 (pp. 659–679).
-
Marcus, Joel.
Mark 8–16. The Anchor Yale Bible, Vol. 27A. Binghamton, NY: Yale
University Press, 2009 (“Postscript: The Markan Ending,” pp.
1088–1096).
-
__________.
The Way of the Lord: Christological Exegesis of the Old Testament in
the Gospel of Mark. London: T&T Clark, 1993.
-
McDill, Matthew
D. “A Textual and Structural Analysis of Mark 16:9–20.” FilNeot
17 (2004): 27–43.
-
McGrath, James F.
“How Mark’s Gospel Originally Ended.” Patheos, November 2,
2007, accessed July 25, 2015. http://www.patheos.com/blogs/exploringourmatrix/2007/11/how-marks-gospel-originally-ended.html.
-
McMillan, Earle.
The Gospel according to Mark. Austin, TX: Sweet, 1973.
-
Merklein, Η. “Mk
16,1–8 als Epilog des Markusevangelium.” Pages 209–238 in The
Synoptic Gospels. Ed. C. Focant. BETL 110. Leuven: Peeters and
Leuven UP, 1993.
-
Metzger, Bruce M.
A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament. New York,
NY: United Bible Society, 1994 (pp. 102–107).
-
______________.
“The Ending of the Gospel according to St. Mark in Ethiopic
Manuscript.” Pages 127–47 in New Testament Studies:
Philological, Versional, and Patristic. Leiden: Brill, 1980.
-
______________.
The Text of the New Testament. New York, NY: Oxford
University Press, 1978.
-
Meye, Robert P.
“Mark 16:8: The Ending of Mark’s Gospel.” Biblical Research
14 (1969): 33–43.
-
Miller, David.
“Is Mark 16:9–20 Inspired?” Reason and Revelation 25 (2005):
89–95.
-
Missler, Chuck.
“Additions or Deletions: The Last 12 Verses of Mark.” Koinonia
House, February 2000, accessed July 25, 2015. http://www.khouse.org/articles/2000/201/.
-
Molina, Francisco
J. A Literary and Rhetorical Analysis of the Longer Ending of the
Gospel of Mark (Mark 16:9–20). Thesis (S.T.L.): Catholic
University of America, 1997.
-
Moloney, Francis
J. The Gospel of Mark: A Commentary. Peabody, MA:
Hendrickson, 2002 (pp. 339–362).
-
Morison, James.
A Practical Commentary on the Gospel According to St. Mark.
London: Hodder & Stoughton, 1892.
-
Moule, C.F.D.
“St. Mark xvi.8 Once More.” NTS 2 (1955–56): 58–59.
-
Myers, Ched.
Binding the Strong Man: A Political Reading of Mark’s Story of
Jesus. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books, 1988 (“The Apocryphal
Endings: A Reflection on ‘Imperial Rewrites,’” pp. 401–404).
-
Neirynck, F.
“Marc 16,1–8: Tradition et redaction: Tombeau vide et angélophanie.”
ETL 56 (1980): 56–88.
-
Nineham, D.E.
The Gospel of St. Mark. Pelican Gospel Commentaries.
Harmondsworth, UK: Penguine, 1963 (pp. 439–453).
-
Nunn, Nicholas P.
A New Case for the Authenticity of Mark 16:9–20. Eugene, OR:
Pickwick Publications, 2014.
-
O’Collins,
Gerald. “The Fearful Silence of Three Women (Mark 16:8c).”
Gregorianum 69, no. 3 (1988 1988): 489-503.
-
Oden, Thomas C.,
and Christopher A. Hall, eds. Mark. ACCS. Downers Grove, IL:
InterVarsity, 1998 (pp. 245–256).
-
Oppermann, R.
“Eine Beobachtung in Bezug auf das Problem des Markusschlusses.”
BN 40 (1987): 24–29.
-
Ottley, R. R. “ἐφοβοῦντο
γάρ, Mark xvi 8.”
JTS
o.s. 27
(1926): 407–409.
-
Paulsen, Η. “Mk
xvi 1–8.” NovT 22 (1980): 138–175.
-
Perkins, Pheme.
“The Gospel of Mark.” Pages 509–733 in The New Interpreter’s
Bible, Vol.
8.
Nashville, TN: Abington Press, 1994 (pp. 726–733).
-
Pesch,
Rudolf. Das Markusevangelium. Herders theologischer Kommentar
zum Neuen Testament.
Frieburg/Basel/Vienna:
Herder, 1984 (pp. 535–543; “Anhang 1: Der längere
Markusschluss [16, 9–20],” pp. 544–566; “Anhang 2: Der kürzere
Markusschluss,” pp. 557–559).
-
Peterson, Norman
R. “When is the End Not the End? Literary Reflections on the Ending
of Mark’s Narrative.” Int 34 (1980): 153–162.
-
Pokorny, P.
“‘Anfang des Evangelium’: Zum Problem des Anfangs und des Schlusses
des Markusevangeliums.” Pages 115–131 in Die Kirche des Anfangs.
FS H. Schürmann,
ed. R. Schnackenburg. ETS 38. Leipzig: St. Benno, 1977.
-
Reedy, Charles J.
“Mark 8:31–11:10 and the Gospel Ending: A Redaction Study.”
Catholic Biblical Quarterly 34, no 2 (April 1972): 188–197.
-
Rhoads, David.
“Narrative Criticism and the Gospel of Mark.” Journal of the
American Academy of Religion 50 (1982): 411–427.
-
__________,
Joanna Dewey, and Donald Michie. Mark as Story. Minneapolis,
MN: Fortress, 1999.
-
Richardson, L.J.D.
“St. Mark xvi. 8.” JTS o.s. 49 (1948): 144–146.
-
Rist, Martin. “Is
Mark a Complete Gospel?” Anglican Theological Review 14, no 2
(Spring 1932): 143–151.
-
Robinson, B.A.
“Alleged Forgery in the Gospel of Mark.” Religious Tolerance,
March 3, 2008, accessed July 25, 2015. http://www.religioustolerance.org/mark_16.htm.
-
Robinson, Maurice
A. “The Long Ending of Mark as Canonical Veracity.” Pages 40–79 in
Perspectives on the Ending of Mark. Edited by David Alan
Black. Nashville: Broadman and Holman, 2008.
-
Rolland,
Philippe. “Marc, première harmonie évangélique.” Revue Biblique
90, no 1 (January 1983): 23–79.
-
Sabin, Marie.
The Gospel according to Mark. Collegeville, MN: Liturgical
Press, 2006.
-
________. “The
Women Transformed: The Ending of Mark Is the Beginning of Wisdom.”
Cross Currents 48, no 2 (1998): 149–168.
-
Sapaugh, Gregory
Paul. An Appraisal of the Intrinsic Probability of the Longer
Endings of the Gospel of Mark. Thesis/Dissertation: Dallas
Theological Seminary, 2013.
-
Schlier, H. “Die
Osterbotschaft aus dem Grab (Markus 16,1–8).” Katholische Gedanke
27 (1971): 1–6.
-
Schmithals,
Walter. “Der Markusschluß, die Verklärungsgeschichte und die
Aussendung der Zwölf.” Zeitschrift für Theologie und Kirche
Vol. 69, No. 4 (1972): 379-411
-
Schneider, G.
“‘Er ist auferweckt worden!’ Eine Auslegung von Mk 16,1–8.” Der
Katholische Erzieher 17 (1964): 113–117.
-
Schweizer,
Eduard. The Good News According to Mark. Richmond: John Knox
Press, 1970 (pp. 365–379). Original German Version: Das
Evangelium nach Markus. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1967
(pp. 212–220).
-
Shepherd, Thomas
R. “Narrative Analysis as a Text Critical Tool: Mark 16 in Codex W
as a Test Case.” Journal for the Study of the New Testament
32, no 1 (September 2009): 77–98.
-
Shin, Hyeon Woo.
“The Historic Present as a Discourse Marker and Textual Criticism in
Mark.” TBT 63.1 (2012): 39–51.
-
Smith, Drew. “Why
Did Mark’s Gospel End So Abruptly?” Ethics Daily, April 16,
2010, accessed July 25, 2015. http://www.ethicsdaily.com/why-did-marks-gospel-end-so-abruptly-cms-15926.
-
Smith, R. H. “New
and Old in Mark 16:1–8.” CTM 43 (1972): 518–527.
-
Snapp Jr., James
Edward. “Authentic: The Case for Mark 16:9–20.” [No publisher].
Kindle Edition, 2012.
-
Spencer, Aida
Besancon. “The Denial of the Good News and the Ending of Mark.”
BBR 17.2 (2007): 269–283.
-
Stein, Robert H.
“The Ending of Mark.” BBR 18.1 (2008): 79–98.
-
________. Mark.
BECNT. Grand Rapids: Baker, 2008 (pp. 727–733; “the Ending of Mark,”
pp. 733–738).
-
Stock, Augustine.
The Method and Message of Mark. Wilmington, DE: Glazier,
1989.
-
Strauss, Mark L.
Mark: Zondervan Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament.
Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2014 (pp. 714–725; “The Endings
of Mark’s Gospel,” pp. 727–731).
-
Swete, Henry
Barclay. The Gospel According to St. Mark: The Greek Text with
Introduction, Notes and Indices. Reprint. Grand Rapids: Kregel,
1977 (“Alternative Endings of the Gospel,” pp. ciii–cxiii; pp.
398–408).
-
Synge, F.C. “Mark
16.1–8.” JTSA 11 (1975): 71–73.
-
________. “Matter
of Tenses: Fingerprints of an Annotator in Mark.” The Expository
Times 88, no 6 (July 1977): 168–171.
-
Tabor, James D.
“The ‘Strange’ Ending of the Gospel of Mark and Why It Makes All the
Difference.” Tabor Blog, August 25, 2012, accessed July 25,
2015. http://jamestabor.com/2012/08/25/the-strange-ending-of-the-gospel-of-mark-and-why-it-makes-all-the-difference/.
-
Taylor, Charles.
“Some Early Evidence for the Twelve Verses Mark XVI. 9–20.” Pages
71–80 in The Expositor, Vol. 8. Edited by Robertson Nicholl.
London: Hodder & Stoughton, 1893.
-
Taylor, Vincent.
The Gospel according to St. Mark: The Greek Text with
Introduction, Notes and Indexes. New York: Macmillan, 1966 (pp.
610-615).
-
Telford, William
R., ed. The Interpretation of Mark. London: T&T Clark, 1995.
-
Terry, Bruce.
“The Style of the Long Ending of Mark.” Appendix in A Student’s
Guide to New Testament Textual Variants. [No Publisher] 1998.
http://bible.ovu.edu/terry//tc/index.htm. Accessed August 8, 2015.
Originally published in abbreviated form as: “Another Look at the
Ending of Mark.” Firm Foundation 93 (September 14, 1976).
-
Thomas, John C.
“A Reconsideration of the Ending of Mark.” JETS 26 (1983):
407–419.
-
Thomas, John
Christopher and Kimberly Ervin Alexander. “‘And the Signs Are
Following’: Mark 16:9–20—A Journey into Pentecostal Hermeneutics.”
Journal of Pentecostal Theology 11 (2003): 147–170.
-
Tobin, Paul. “The
Spurious Endings of Mark.” The Rejection of Pascal’s Wager,
accessed July 25, 2015. http://www.rejectionofpascalswager.net/nomark.html.
-
Tolbert, Mary
Ann. Sowing in the Gospel: Mark’s World in Literary–Historical
Perspective. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 1989.
-
Trompf, G.W. “The
First Resurrection Appearance and the Ending of Mark’s Gospel.”
NTS 18 (1972): 308–330.
-
________. “The
Markusschluss in Recent Research.” Australian Biblical Review
21 (October 1973): 15–26.
-
Turner, C.H. “Did
Codex Vercellensis (a) Contain the Last Twelve Verses of St
Mark?” JTS 29 (1927–1928): 16–18.
-
Upton, Bridget
Gilfillan. Hearing Mark’s Endings: Listening to Ancient Popular
Texts through Speech Act Theory. Leiden: Brill, 2005.
-
Van der Horst,
P.W. “Can a Book End with a
ΓΑΡ?
A Note on Mark XVI.8.” Journal of Theological Studies 23
(1972) 121–124.
-
Van Iersel, Bas.
Reading Mark. Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press, 1989.
-
Van Linden,
Philip. The Gospel According to Mark. Collegeville, MN:
Liturgical Press, 1991.
-
Vignolo, R. “Una
finale reticente: interpretazione narrativa di Mc 16,8.” RivB
3 (1990): 129–89.
-
Voelz, James W.
“Textual Criticism of the Gospel of Mark: Trying to Make Progress.”
Concordia 31, no 1 (January 2005): 2–11
-
Waetjen, H.C.
A Reordering of Power: A Socio-political Reading of Mark’s Gospel.
Minneapolis: Fortress, 1989.
-
_________. “The
Ending of Mark and the Gospels’ Shift in Eschatology.” ASTI 4
(1965): 114–131.
-
Wallace, Daniel
B. “Irony in the End: A Textual and Literary Analysis of Mark 16:8.”
Bible.org, accessed July 25, 2015. https://bible.org/article/irony-end-textual-and-literary-analysis-mark-168.
-
_________. “Mark
16:8 as the Conclusion to the Second Gospel.” Pages 1–39 in
Perspectives on the Ending of Mark. Edited by David Alan Black.
Nashville: Broadman and Holman, 2008.
-
Ward, Doug.
“Lessons from the ‘Sudden Ending’ of Mark’s Gospel.” Grace and
Knowledge, February 8, 2005, accessed July 25 2015. http://graceandknowledge.faithweb.com/mark16.html.
-
Wasserman, Tommy.
“The Greek Manuscripts in Sweden with an Excursus on the Jerusalem
Colophon.” Svensk Exegetisk Arsbok 75 (2010): 77–107.
-
Watts, Rikki E.
Isaiah’s New Exodus in Mark. Grand Rapids: Baker, 1997 (pp.
365–376).
-
Wax, Trevin.
“Original Ending of Mark Found! (Sort of).” The Gospel Coalition,
December 20, 2006, accessed July 25, 2015. http://www.thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/trevinwax/2006/12/20/original-ending-of-mark-found-sort-of/.
-
Wessel, Walter W.
and Mark L. Strauss. “Mark.” Pages 671–989 in The Expositor’s
Bible Commentary. Vol. 9. Revised ed. Tramper Longman III and
David E. Garland, eds. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2010 (pp. 984–989).
-
Wiéner, Claude.
“Le mystere pascal dans le deuxieme evangile: Recherches sur la
construction de Mark 14–16.” Pages 131–145 in Charpentier, Etienne,
Martin Benzerath, Aloyse Schmid, Jacques Guillet, and F.-X. Durrwell.
La Pâque du Christ, mystère de salut: mélanges offerts au P.F.-X.
Durrwell pour son 70e anniversaire. Paris: Editions du Cerf,
1982.
-
Wilckens, U. “Die
Perikope vom leeren Grab Jesu in der nachmarkinischen
Traditionsgeschichte.” Pages 30–41 in Festschrift für Friednch
Smend zum 70. Geburtstag. Berlin: Merseburger, 1963.
-
Williams, Joel.
“Does Mark’s Gospel Have an Outline?” JETS 49.3 (2006):
505–525.
-
________.
“Literary Approaches to the End of Mark’s Gospel.” JETS 42,
no 1 (March 1999): 21–35.
-
Williams, Travis
B. “Bringing Method to Madness: Examining the Style of the Longer
Ending of Mark.” BBR 20.3 (2010): 397–418.
-
Williamson Jr.,
Lamar. Mark: Interpretation: A Bible Commentary for Teaching and
Preaching. Atlanta, GA: John Knox Press, 1983.
-
Wilson, W.G. “St.
Mark xvi.8: A Modern Greek Parallel.” JTS o.s. 50 (1949):
57–59.
-
Witherington III,
Ben. The Gospel of Mark: A Socio–Rhetorical Commentary.
Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2001.
-
Xue, Xiaxia. “A
Narrative Analysis of the Longer Ending of Mark: Encounter the Risen
Jesus.” CGST 53 (July 2012): 133–167.
-
Zahn, Theodor.
Introduction to the New Testament. Vol.
2. Translated by John Moore Trout, et. al. Grand Rapids: Kregel,
1953 (pp. 467–487). Origial German:
Einleitung in das
Neue Testament.
Leipzig: A. Deichert, 1906.
-
Zwemer, Samuel.
“The Last Twelve Verses of Mark.” Pages 159–174 in Counterfeit or
Genuine?: Mark 16? John 8? Edited by David Otis Fuller. Grand
Rapids: Grand Rapids International Publications, 1990.